Marker Logo
THE HISTORICAL
MARKER DATABASE
“Bite-Size Bits of Local, National, and Global History”
Near Dillon in Beaverhead County, Montana — The American West (Mountains)
 

The Route and Campsites of Lewis and Clark in Montana: A Geologic Perpective

by Robert N. Bergantino and Kenneth L Sandau

 
 
The Route and Campsites of Lewis and Clark in Montana: A Geologic Perpective Marker image. Click for full size.
Photographed by Barry Swackhamer, June 28, 2024
1. The Route and Campsites of Lewis and Clark in Montana: A Geologic Perpective Marker
Captions: (the photos are numbered 1-9) 1 White Cliffs "The water in the course of time in descending from those hills and plains on either side of the river has trickled down the soft sand clifs and woarn it into a thousand grotesque figures, which with the help of a little immagination and an oblique view at a distance, are made to represent eligant ranges of lofty freestone buildings, having their parapets well stocked with statuary..." (Lewis, May 31, 1805); 2 Great Falls "immediately at the cascade the river is about 300 yards: about ninty or a hundred yards of this next the Lard. bluff is a smoth even sheet of water falling over a precipice of at least eighty feet, the remaining part of about 200 yards on my right loams the grandest sight I ever beheld. the hight of the fall is the same of the other but the irregular and somewhat projecting rocks below receives the water in it's passage down and brakes it into a perfect white foam which assumes a thousand forms in a moment sometimes flying up in jets of sparkling foam to a height of fifteen or twenty feet..." (Lewis, June 13, 1805); 3 Square Butte See a geological analysis of Lewis; observations on Square Butte in the sidebar.; 4 Gates of the Mountains "... this evening we entered much the most remarkable clifts that we have yet seen. these clifts rise from the waters edge on either side perpendicularly to the hight of 1200 feet. every object here wears a dark and gloomy aspect. the tow(er)ing and projecting rocks in many places seem ready to tumble on us. the river appears to have forced it's way through this immense body of solid rock for the distance of 5 1/4 miles and where it makes it's exit below has thrown on either side vast collumns of rock mountains high." (Lewis, July 29, 1805).; 5 Beaverhead Rock "...the Indian woman recognized the point of a high plain to our right...this hill she says her nation calls the beaver's head from a conceived resemblance of it's figure to the head of that animal..." (Lewis, August 8, 1805.; 6 Lolo Creek "these springs rise from the bottom and through the interstices of a grey freestone rock, the rock rises in iregular (?) in a circular range around the springs on their lower side... the prinspal spring is about the temperature of the warmest baths used at the hot springs in Virginia." (Lewis, June 29, 1806).; 7 Crazy Mountains "...there is also a high rugid Mtn. on which is Snow bearing North 15 or 20 miles, but few flowers to be Seen in those plains, low grass in the high plains, and the Common corse grass, rushes and a species of rye is the growth of the low; 8 Pompeys Pillar "This rock which I shall Call Pompy's Tower is 200 feet high and 400 paces in secumphrance and only axcesable on one Side, which is from the N.E. the other parts of it being a perpendicular Clift of lightish Coloured gritty rock on the top there is a tolerable soil; 9 Sheridan Butte "here the river approaches the high mountanious Country on the N.W. Side. those hills appear to be composed of various Coloured earth and Coal without much rock." (Clark, July 31, 1806).
Inscription. At the beginning of the 1800s, the science of Geology still was in its infancy; in fact the word geology in its currently accepted meaning was not used until 1778. Before the mid=1700s, the study of the origins of the earth and its rocks, rivers, and mountains was essentially a philosophical plaything, a part of Natural History or Natural Philosophy. In America, the science of geology was even less known and less developed than in Europe. Lewis had neither formal not practical training in geology, mining, or mineralogy, although he possibly had the opportunity to acquire some knowledge from Jefferson's library. Lewis' second in command, Clark, also had no training or experience in geology. The other members of the expedition were principally backwoodsmen, hunters, or enlisted soldiers. Like their leaders, much of their "understanding" of geology was based on the common knowledge and popular misconception of the time.
The geologic vocabulary of Lewis and Clark reveals much about their understanding of geology. The journal entries name several rock types: chalk, flint, flintstone, freestone, granite, lava, limestone,
Paid Advertisement
Click or scan to see
this page online
marble, marl, pumicestone, sandstone, sand rock, slate, slate stone, and slate rock. Lewis and Clark generally used the terms chalk, marl, and sandstone, correctly. They applied the term freestone to any rock that was layered, split, or looked like it could be split easily into layers; generally, for rocks that we now know were sandstone and limestone. Sometimes, however, they used that term for rocks that certainly were granitic, perhaps seeing the slabs that resulted from spheroidal weathering or seeing closely spaced fractures. Lewis and Clark occasionally used the term flint, sometimes correctly, sometimes applying it generically for many silica-rich rocks. They used granite both for any crystalline rock and for any hard rock that was not distinctly bedded even though of sedimentary origin. Generally, when they called a rock limestone. it was limestone, but some limestone that they saw they called granite or shale. They used the term marble in the sense of an ornamental stone rather than as a rock, and lava and pumicestone for the products formed from the burning of coal beds. They used the term slate for shale, argillite, or
The Route and Campsites of Lewis and Clark in Montana: A Geologic Perpective Marker image. Click for full size.
Photographed by Barry Swackhamer, June 28, 2024
2. The Route and Campsites of Lewis and Clark in Montana: A Geologic Perpective Marker
any other thin-bedded rock that was not sandstone or limestone.
Except for the common metals, the explore's mineral vocabulary was largely apothecary or medical in origin. Among the mineral terms in their vocabulary we find: alum, arsenic, cobalt, copperas, epsom salt, glauber salts, iron ore, isinglass, lead, lime, marcasite, mercury, niter, pyrite, quartz, salt, saltpeter, salts of tartar, silver, talc, white vitriol, and yellow ocher. Most of the minerals and salts that Lewis and Clark identified using these names were identified incorrectly.
Lewis and Clark (but especially Lewis) often ascribed colors to rocks that probably resulted from conditions of sunlight, shadow, or vegetation rather than to actual color of the rocks themselves. This incorrect description of rock colors has caused confusion regarding the location of certain geographical features. Lewis, for example, on July 19, 1805, wrote: "...this rock is a black grannite below and appears to be of a much lighter colour above and from fragments I take it to be flint of a yellowish brown and light creemcolord yellow...from the singular appearance of this place I
Paid Advertisement
called the gates of the rocky mountains ..."
Some have argued that historians have misidentified the location of the Gates of the Mountains because the rocks there are neither granite nor black. Yet careful study of Clark's maps and the expedition's original river survey places that observation precisely at the spot that now goes by the name Gates of the Mountains.
Both Lewis and Clark had a good command of geographic terms and used most of them in their current meaning. Lewis also seems to have had a more specialized geologic vocabulary, perhaps derived from books in Jefferson's library. Among the specialized terms he used appear: argillaceous, calcareous, carbonated wood, conchoidal fracture, crystallized, fossil, incrustation, interstice, and strata.
If the geologic descriptions and interpretations that Lewis and Clark make are evaluated with respect to their lack of specialized training, most of their observations can be interpreted satisfactorily Lewis and Clark and the others of the expedition boldly excel is not in their interpretations of geology, but in their observations of it. Their geologic observations were among the finest of the day in America. In addition both men seemed well aware of certain geomorphic processed, especially river mechanics. This knowledge likely did not come from the books available to Lewis as Jefferson's secretary, but from his practical experience and his keen observational ability. Clark had even less chance to learn geology from scientific books of the day, yet his skills as an observer and his understanding of stream processes are consistently demonstrated in his writings.
Most geographic and geologic descriptions in the expedition's journals are interesting in themselves. They become more interesting and useful when the reader knowns what the feature described was or how it relates to the surrounding geography or geology. Below is a short quote for Lewis' journal entry dated Monday 15th, 1805, footnoted with current geological information and descriptions (journal entry as transcribed by Gary E. Moulton, Editor, "Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, The Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition." with permission):

,,, we have now passed Fort MountainΉ on our right it appears to be about ten miles distant. this mountain has a singular appearance it is situated in a level plain, it's sides stand nearly at right angles with each other and are about a mile² in extent, these are formed of a yellow clay³ only without the mixture of rock or stone of any size and rise perpendicularly to the hight of 300 feet.⁴ the top appears to be level plain⁵ and from the eminence on which I was yesterday I could see that it was covered with a similar cost of grass⁶ with the plain on which it stands. the surface appears to also to possess a tolerable fertile mole of 2 feet thick. and is to all appearance inaccessible. from it's figure we gave it the name of fort mountain..."

----------------------------------------------------------

Ή Square Butte, which rises 22 miles southwest of Great Falls and 10 miles west of Ulm.

² The butte's east and west sides are about 1 ½ miles long and its north and south sides are about Ύ mile each.

³ The most conspicuous part of Square Butte is the nearly horizontal mass of an igneous rock called basalt that form the upper three-fourths (700 feet) of the butte. The basalt is all that remains of a laccolith-a "blister of solidified magma that intruded sedimentary rocks and domed them upwards. This laccolith formed during the Late Cretaceous time when magma from the volcanic center of the Adel Mountains, about 10 miles south of the butte, intruded a near-vertical fracture in sedimentary rocks. As this magma sheet reached the area where Square Butte currently stands, it began to force its way between the horizontal layers of sedimentary rock, bowing the upper layers upward as it continued to flow in. The nearly flat base of the laccolith may then have been more than 2000 feet below ground surface. As the molten material cooled and solidified, vertical cracks (joints) developed in the rock. These joints generally formed six-sided columns which can be seen around much of the rim of the butte. Horizontal layering of the laccolith also can be sen in certain localities. The basalt (Shonkinite) that forms this laccolith is much more resistant to erosion that the sedimentary formations into which it forced its way.
The sedimentary formation in which the laccolith intruded is named the Virgell Sandstone. It was deposited as a coastal sand about 80 million years ago during the Late Cretaceous and is the same formation that produced the White Cliffs of the Missouri about 150 miles to the northeast (the White Cliffs also are noted in Lewis' journals). Originally about 399 feet thick, only about 120 feet of the Virgelle Sandstone remains here; it is found just below the basalt. Erosion has removed the upper 280 feet of this sandstone and all the formations that lay above it. Below the Virgelle Sandstone is the Telegraph Creek Formation; it is about 300 feet thick and is fairly sandy at the top, but grades downward into shale. The base of the butte is composed of the Marias River Shale, named for its exposures near the mouth of the Marias River.

⁴ Square Butte's highest point is at 4797 feet above sea level; the height of the surrounding plains ranges from 3500 to 3700 feet, Thus the summit is more that 1000 feet above the plains-not 300 feet. Lewis' description of the length and shape of Square Butte and the nature of its summit surface shows that he gave the butte more than just a casual glance, but it is hard to explain how he underestimated it height so badly or failed to notice the rock that rings the summit plain. He must have assumed that the material forming Square Butte was the same as that of the smaller, still-unnamed buttes near the falls that he had seen on June 13, 1805 from less than 2 miles away,

⁵ The more nearly level summit plain altitude averages 4650 feet and contains at least 1000 acres (1.6 square miles).

⁶ On this upper plain grow plants specimens that are more indigenous to the pre-settlement plains than those that now grow on the plains that surround the base.

This map provides an overview of the routes and campsites of the Lewis and Clark Expedition in Montana that will enable a general understanding of the fascinating geographical and geological observations recorded in their journals. For a more detailed and comprehensive accounting of campsites or for information about our broad catalog of reports and geologic maps, please contact the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology.

R.N. Bergantino
Associate Research Hydrologist Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology
 
Erected by Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology.
 
Topics and series. This historical marker is listed in these topic lists: ExplorationNatural Features. In addition, it is included in the Lewis & Clark Expedition series list. A significant historical date for this entry is June 13, 1805.
 
Location. 44° 59.669′ N, 112° 52.1′ W. Marker is near Dillon, Montana, in Beaverhead County. It can be reached from State Highway 324 near Lake View Road, on the right when traveling east. The marker is locate at the Clark Canyon Recreation Area near the flagpole. Touch for map. Marker is in this post office area: Dillon MT 59725, United States of America. Touch for directions.

Regionally, this marker is in andspecifically outhwest Montana, in Gold West Country, in Mining Country. It is also in the American Mountain West and in the Lewis & Clark Corridor. Globally, it is in North America, the Rocky Mountains, the Western Hemisphere, the Western World, and the Anglosphere. Historically, it finds itself in what was once Rupert’s Land and also the Louisiana Purchase.

Other nearby markers. At least 8 other markers are within walking distance of this marker: …the End of the Northwest Passage? (here, next to this marker); Reunion at Camp Fortunate (here, next to this marker); Camp Fortunate (a few steps from this marker); it has a singular appearence (a few steps from this marker); The Lewis and Clark Expedition (approx. Ό mile away); "it was mutually advantageous..." (approx. Ό mile away); Fortunate Camp (approx. Ό mile away); Sacajawea (approx. 0.6 miles away). Touch for a list and map of all markers in Dillon.
 
 
Credits. This page was last revised on September 8, 2024. It was originally submitted on September 8, 2024, by Barry Swackhamer of Brentwood, California. This page has been viewed 1,845 times since then and 188 times this year. Photos:   1, 2. submitted on September 8, 2024, by Barry Swackhamer of Brentwood, California.
m=256272

CeraNet Cloud Computing sponsors the Historical Marker Database.
This website earns income from purchases you make after using our links to Amazon.com. We appreciate your support.
Paid Advertisement
Jul. 11, 2026